| row | TSPO | P2X7 receptor | CSF1R |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2022, https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.09.21.22280 194 De novo PD patients vs HC (Rodriguez-Chinchilla, 2020 #2163) Raav-BASED ASYN RAT MODEL (intranigral injection of AAV) → [18F]-DPA714 ↑ in SN, preceding TH loss. DPA-714 signal이 16w 까지 계속 증가하며 이 때 microglial morphology는 reactive 가 predominant!. Correlation between DPA-714 and IBA1 cells: r=0.41 (significant), Correlation between DPA-714 and TH cells: r=0.45 (significant), Correlation between DPA-714 and GFAP cells: only r=0.17 (non-significant). Cf) (Hagens, 2018 #2144) POC of [18F]DPA in MS patients [3rd generation] insensitive to TSPO rs6971 polymorphisms ( [18F]GE-180 (=flutriciclamide) (R,S)-[18F]GE-387, [11C]ER176, [11C]CB184, [11C]CB190, [11C]N'-MPB, [18F]LW223 Good review: (Zhou, 2021 #2050) |
[SMC] (Lee, 2022 #2005): 18F([1] 5-cyano-N-(4-(4-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)piperazin-1-yl)-2-(piperidin-[18F]1-yl)phenyl)furan-2-carboxamide,
|
18F-JNJ-64413739, has initial human data, preclinical data are available online (www.nas.edu). 11C-GSK1482160, has been evaluated in vitro, in vivo in both mice and EAE rat models (Han et al., 2017), have human data presented at conference [108, 110] 11C-GSK1482160 has been characterised in a LPS model of inflammation where VT was significantly increased upon treatment, with 97% of the increased signal displaced in LPS and homologous block-treated animals [111]. The in vivo selectivity profile for 11C-GSK1482160 is currently lacking heterologous P2X7 blocking data. In vitro response to P2X7-expressing cells and correlation to expression of P2X7 and activated microglia in an ex vivo multiple sclerosis rodent model both increase confidence in selectivity [111,112], but are not in themselves proof of P2X7 binding in vivo. a second generation CSF1R PET in development by J&J : potential that this new ligand is undergoing FiH testing [11C]NCGG401 (Ogata, 2022 #2023) National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology
| |
| Link to microglia | nonspecific to migroglia, reactive glial cells. Due to limitations of TSPO-targeted PET, including a lack of cell type specificit | 11C-SMW139, currently being evaluated in PD patients (www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu, EudraCT Number: 2018-000405-23, https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2018-000405-23/FI). It was proposed as potential marker of M1 microglia, however, there is little evidence to support lack of expression of P2X7 on M2 subpopulation, with multiple studies contradicting this hypothesis [267, 268]. | The gene encoding the cognate ligand for CSF1R, CSF1, is up-regulated in stage 2 disease-associated microglia (DAM), |
| limitation | A third issue is that TSPO presence reflects a broader inflammatory state since TSPO is also expressed to a lesser extent on astrocytes and on peripheral immune cells in the brain if the BBB is broken. Fourth, current TSPO tracers bind to both the M1 and M2 phenotypes of activated microglia | Issue with cell-specific expression (expressed peripherally & in microglia, astrocytes, and Schwann cells in the CNS. P2X7 receptor is mainly expressed in microglia cells but its expression level is low in astrocytes and some neurons [20]. | (De Lucia, 2016 #1790) Although a report recently suggested CSF1R is expressed and functions in neurons (Luo et al. 2013), we observed that CSF1R-modulatory approaches are specific for microglia, and found no evidence that the receptor is expressed either by neurons or astrocytes, supporting previously reported data (Erblich et al. 2011; Gomez-Nicola et al. 2013; Sasmono et al. 2003). |
| Link to PD |
(Gerhard, 2006 #655) Cross-sectional 11 HC & PD (n=18, all stage, mean H&Y 2.3), : ↑ TSPO signal in SN, BG, cortex, ant & post cingulate gyrus, brainstem: But microglial activation did not correlate with clinical severity or putamen 18F]-dopa uptake Correlation analysis (Pearson statistics) revealed a significant negative correlation between [11C](R)-PK11195 binding potential values in the anterior and posterior cingulate and clinical duration of symptoms (r = 0.559, P = 0.012 and r = 0.636, P = 0.005 respectively) as well as in the thalamus (r = 0.526, P = 0.025). BP values in other regions did not correlate significantly |
{Van Weehaeghe, 2019 #1793} 2ND, a small (twofold) increase in the P2X7R gene in RNA extracted from the substantia nigra in PD patients [44]. | TO BE EXPLORED! |
|
Figure 2 (bar-chart panels, kept as evidence in `body_r04_c01.jpg`): Caption: Fig. 2. Mean binding potential values with standard deviation (SD) for the patients at baseline and the healthy volunteers. Significant increases are indicated: *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; sn = substantia nigra. Increases indicated as (*) did not survive testing for multiple comparisons. (positively or negatively) with either clinical parameters or 18 putaminal [F]-dopa signal | |||
| Longitudinal cohort: PD (N=8), no longitudinal change over 2 y, despite change in UPDRS (19→ 25) & putaminal [18F]-dopa Ki values (6.7% ANNUAL DECLINE) | |||
Cristian's paper: Varnas 2019 (PBR28, PD), Nettis 2020 (PBR28, sc IFN-a CHALLENGE hv),
| |||
|
(Ghadery, 2017 #1642) "Koshimori 2015 의 extension" stratified by rs6971 polymorphism, MABs) (14 PD patients and 11 age-matched HC (HC)) and 27 (HABs) (16 PD patients and 11 age-matched HC) [18F]-FEPPA → Results: no difference in PD vs HC (Ghadery 2020): [18F]-FEPPA: HAB vs MAB 구분 결과 없는 듯 (Koshimori, 2015 #1773) this is just a part of (Ghadery, 2017 #1642) |
{Van Weehaeghe, 2019 #1793} 2ND recent study in a rat model of neuroinflammation using the 18F analogue [18F]JNJ64413739 showed that P2X7R is involved in early microglial activation. The highest signal was observed 2-3 days after LPS injection, after which this effect disappeared. Moreover, increased uptake of [18F]JNJ64413739 was shown to correspond with increased Iba1 staining, a microglial marker, indicating that P2X7R radioligands are probably able to visualize microglial activation [23]. | ||
|
(Ouchi, 2005 #656) [11C](R)-PK11195 (300MBq) Cross-sectional: 10 early (drug-naïve) PD patients vs 10 age-matched HC, ↑ (midbrain) TSPO signal in midbrain (didn't look at cortex), Table 2 (kept as evidence in `body_r05_c01.jpg`, lower portion clipped): Levels of Binding Potential (b/c) for [11C]CFT and [11C]PK11195. Mean (SD) with Group / Tracer / [11C]CFT / [11C]PK11195 columns broken into Striatum (Anterior / Caudate / Putamen) and Cortex (Ventral / Frontal / Dorsal / Thalamus) sub-columns; row data values are too small to transcribe with confidence. |
Uncertain Spans
| location | transcription | uncertainty |
|---|---|---|
Link to microglia / TSPO cell tail | reads including a lack of cell type specificit with the trailing y clipped at the cell edge in this capture. | clipped at cell boundary; not reconstructed. |
Link to PD / TSPO / In vivo PET note in NCGG401 cell | the cell-text characters surrounding the bar-chart figure are partly clipped by the chart crop; the surrounding paragraph is reconstructed from the visible portions in body_r03_c01.jpg and body_r04_c01.jpg. | partial clip; preserved as visible. |
Link to PD / Ouchi 2005 Table 2 row values | Table 2 of Ouchi 2005 is visible at the bottom of body_r05_c01.jpg but row data values are too small for confident transcription; only the header structure is recorded. | left as evidence only. |