Primary Rat MicrogliaBz ATP Rat brainAAV aSyn rat brainWt rat?
P20: IC502.1 (0.8-6) nM, free Cave
P10: IC501.6 (0.4-7) nM, free Cav, (modelling)
P10: IC5010 (4.1-24.3) nM, free Cav, (modelling, p25)
IL1b: IC507.6 nM
IL1b: IC9068.4 nM
Cbr,u @4h - 3 mg/kg (MED)66 Nm (ie the last measurement after dosing)
Cbr,u @4h - 10 mg/kg (MED)65 nM (ie the last measurement after dosing)
Cbr,u AUC - 10 mg/kg (MED)639 nM*h
Cbr,u Cmax - 10 mg/kg (MED)198 ng/ml*H

PK/PD

MethodCNS 1CNS 2Peripheral
mice are pre-treated with an NLRP3 inhibitor (po) → BzATP (Infusion FC) → KILL & levels of IL-1β are measured in the FC ,
Dose PO TR06673219 — 200 µg BzATP Infusion FC — Necropsy, Measure IL-1 (FC section, ELISA)
timeline: 0h → 1h → 24h
mice are pre-treated with an NLRP3 inhibition → 6ohda mice are pre-treated with an NLRP3 inhibitor (po) → LPS (0.1 mpk, ip, priming) → ATP (100 mpk, ip, for activation) → levels of IL-1β are measured in the plasma,
Dose PO TR06673219 — 0.1mg/kg LPS, IP (priming step) — 100 mg/kg ATP, IP (activation step) — Measure (plasma, ?)
timeline: 0h → 1h → 3h → 4h
TR06673219
Dose (mg/kg)Cbr, u (1h) (nM)Cbr, u/IC50
302640455
325143
0.3214
ID50 of 0.018 mg/kg, po [IC50 = 41 nM, Cp ...] (Figure 8).
Dose (mg/kg)Cpl, u (1h) (nM)Cpl, u/IC50
0.0130.6
0.1346
115827
10737127

PK/PD Strategy

  • it will be important in having CSF measurements along with brain and serum that way we can build an understanding of the relationship between brain/CSF/serum levels in healthy vs disease. Since these ratios might be different in healthy vs disease.
  • if we decide to use the IL-1b (serum) MDS-UPDRS correlation as our pathway modulation target. If we use this correlation, we will have to project the human serum measurements to CSF/brain levels to establish how much pathway modulation is required.

[Human target PK setting]

  • 핵심 base for target setting: MCC-950, has demonstrated complete neuroprotection (TH counts similar to AAV empty vector mice) in the AAV/A53T mouse model when dosed 20mpk i.p. every other day (data not shown).
    • RO(%) = -u.b / (K_d + C_u.b)
    • FreeBrain_human = FreeBrain_mouse * (IC50_human / IC50_mouse)
Compound (assay)In vitroFree Brain Target
IC50 (IL-1β suppression)KiCmax (nM)AUC0-24 (nM h)Max RO%
MCC-950 (mouse primary microglia)17.8 (observed)12.65 nM (mouse Ki)90 (observed 겠지)300(=90/(...))
TR06693098 (human microglia/neuron coculture, IPS)15.6 (observed)79 ← 90 × (15.6/17.8) (의미: MCC950 의 Cmax-mouse 90 은, 098 의 Cmax-human 에서는 79 이 상응하겠다. Target 이 됨)263(+90/12.65 × ...)
TR06693098 (human primary microglia, PD)195 (observed)986 ← 90 × (195/17.8) (의미: MCC950 의 Cmax-mouse 90 은, 098 의 Cmax-human 에서는 986 이 상응하겠다. Target 이 됨)3,28788
Cf) TR06693098 Mouse (primary microglia)11.3 (observed)
Cf) TR06693098 (human primary microglia, PD)525 (observed)
TR06693098 (Human) THP-1 cell IL-1b17 (oberved)43 (observed)

MOUSE Free Brain Exposure

Dose (mpk)Cmax (nM)AUC (nM/h)Cavg (nM)
308823647152
10294121651
38836515
1291225

HUMAN Free Brain Target

Correct for species potency differences. Use average across human assays

Mouse Dose (mg/kg)Cmax (nM)AUC (nM/h)Cavg (nM)
308243407142
10275113648
38234114
1271145

Simulate various doses in GastroPlus to match human free brain Cmax, AUC, Cavg

50% Threshold in mouse brain PK/PD assay

(Inline Takeda PKPD slide: “C = Free PK/Potency (@1h)” IL-1β response (plasma) across compounds for TR06628513, TR06673219 (…), TR06647850, TR06673219 with regression annotated r² = 0.79, IC50 = 0.3 ± 0.2/0.4, e = 5.4 ± 0.3/0.6. Adjacent panel “Plasma PKPD Model · Predicted IL-1β response (brain)” shows TR06628513 and TR06673219 dose-response curves with model prediction shaded box. Bullets: “Prediction vs IL-1β reduction in the brain shows decent agreement for TR06628513 and TR06673219 despite different experimental setups”, “Brain IL-1β reduction was estimated based on plasma PKPD relationship with adjusted Imax (as observed in experimental studies)“. Slide preserved as body_r05 evidence.)

Postmortem

  • Translational biomarker data

Proteina

[Proteina Original Study Proposal and Versions in progress]

Feasibility study, like Abbvie ($200k for feasibility study for a hundred sample), sample wanted. 100-10,000 cells , → 1ml (hundres ul) , rodent less, tens of ul, density relation to yoon taeyoung, Roche, who develops feasibility test protocol?
I agree that ASC and GSDMD assay are advanced to the others.
I'm also curious whether they can detected those two markers using human plasma and CSF collected from nigericin-treated rat for translational aspect. But I'm not sure their assay is compatible with rat ASC..
Qs: pathogenic form 맞나? 교수? 더 확인없이 csf 가도 되나? How to 그 폼인지 확인 - cell system, & (particularly) buffer?

-Co-IP?
Antibody: purchase particularly for ASC, GSDMD
To add: mouse, rat, brain/CSF/Plasma

Uncertain Spans

locationtranscriptionuncertainty
Top table p25 row10 (4.1-24.3) nM, free Cav, (modelling, p25)The “p25” annotation could read “P25” or be an emphasis tag.
RO formulaRO(%) = -u.b / (K_d + C_u.b)The numerator glyph appears as a faint “C-u.b” / “Cu·b” — leading negative sign is uncertain.
MCC950 Cmax cell(90/(...))Closing fraction expression is partially cropped by the right edge of the cell.
TR06693098 IPS row90 × (15.6/17.8)The numerator could read 15.6, 156, or 15·6 depending on decimal interpretation.
Plasma PKPD slider² = 0.79, IC50 = 0.3 ± 0.2/0.4The slide chart legend shows mixed glyphs; numbers above are best-effort reads from the slide thumbnail.