GT PK Comparison, Dose Scaling, And Promoter Section

GT PK comparison (continuation)

Affected byCapsidDistribution → cell uptake (ie transduction) → intracellular trafficking → degradation of vector in the cell
- Secretion (so shedding marker)
- Can be affected by immune responses
- Durability of VS (ie loss of episomal DNA)
Transcription rate from DNA to mRNA (특히 이부분이 종간차 커서, NHP은 mouse 대비 수십배까지 적음, 더구나 human potentially has 3x lower transduction & expression efficiency than NHP)(1 vg당 1 mRNA copy니 오시 않고 보통 수십개 나옴.
- mRNA stability
- secretion (글 수 있음)
- Translation rate from mRNA to protein (낭연히 1 vg낭 1 protein 나오는 것이 아님!
- Secretion (글 수 있음)
- Can be affected by immune responses
20210210 Translational science forumCapsid concentration assay may build an exception as established AAVx ELISA may not be feasible for novel (engineered) capsid.이건 PK 에 불포함--이것도 pk에 포함 (TG product 임)이것도 pk 에 포함 (TG product 임)----
Hunter,, TAK-073여러 dose 의 rAAV-GT vg/kg (Mouse)

두 dose 의 rAAV-GT vg/kg (NHP)
안 보네?

안 보네?
I2S (Serum & tissue)
I2S (Serum )
Not shown, (correlate)
I2S activity
-
Not shown
↓ GAG
-
↓ LAMP1 (IHC, for lyso vol)
Normal NHP 라 무의미
-
-
FabryrAAV-GT vg/kg (Mice)

rAAV-GT vg/kg (Human)
αGal (serum & tissue)
αGal (serum & tissues)
Gb3 & Lyso-Gb3 (tissue)
Gb3 & Lyso-Gb3 (tissue)
hemophiliarAAV-GT cp/kg (Human)
cp is capsid particle
FVIIIFVIII activity
DMPK: no need to measure (Parkin GT meeting)The correlation between vector and DNA may not be linear (eg. DNA production may be saturated) Parra-Guillén2010
assayAAVx ELISA may not be feasible for novel (engineered) capsid.qPCRRT-PCRELISA
Discriminate transgene?NA - shire ID tag qPCR (GBA GT preclinical)
- GBA GT (Pharm Sci): the ID-Tag (target region for the dose measurement assay) is incorporated into all potential transgene candidates
- Frataxin gt: NHP biodistribution studies for StrideBio's lead capsids will be performed with a HA-tagged version of the lead expression construct.
  • For the lead cassette epitope tagged versions are being developed which are necessary for biodistribution studies in NHP.
Human influenza (HA) tag in 3 different versions and Myc-tag are considered.
- Sarah Melissa Jacobo: anti-human Parkin (or anti-HA antibody) 가 혹시 있으면 endogenous parkin과 구분할 수 있을지도 (mouse와 구분에 국한될 듯)
- While the antibodies against frataxin protein can discriminate between mouse and human, they do not discriminate between NHP and human (어쨌든 Clinical study에서는 무상관)
------
- 구분 필요 없을 듯: Because
  이차피 Transgene-specific PD 안 존재
- 구분 필요 할 듯, because
  • Endogenous protein 의 functional viability 모르므로 (반론: gba환자에서 대개 gba amount 와 activity가 비례함)
------

The average life span of adult human hepatocytes is around 500 days (20210207 Estimation of Human Efficacious Dose TSF GT modeling)

Dose Scaling for GT

DoseHuman = DoseAnimal · (Scaling factor) · (Activity factor)

  • DoseAnimal
    • Pharmacologically active dose (PAD; usually in vg or vg/kg) in animal models
    • No-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) dose in toxicological species
  • (Scaling factor)
    • Scaling factor based on:
      • Body weight, or
      • Target organ volume
  • (Activity factor)
    • “Relative activity factor” based on perceived species difference in transduction
    • Examples:
      • Internal hemophilia GT programs cited a mouse-to-human factor of 30
      • Mouse-to-human factor of 20 to 100 from external programs
      • NHP-to-human factor: Key issue #1

Species difference (Activity factor)

아래 표 의미: mouse 에서 NHP 거쳐 human 으로 가면서, vg (biodistribution)도 줄고, mRNA 도 줄고, protein 생산도 줄어, 종국에는 human 이 120 배 준다. (from 20221005 Tomoki_modeling strategy for NS GTs for PRKN GT.ppt)

AnalytesMouseNHPshumans
Vg0.7-3.8x-
mRNA57-134x-
Transgene proteins-2.9x
Overall~120x (previous benchmark)

참고: gene efficiency factor (GEF) ({Tang, 2021 #2153})

Scenarios of Objectives of dose exploration in P1 (

  • MTD
  • Range of optimal effective doses
    • achieving a specified target range of exposure that was derived by significant practical limits on the dose of the product that can be produced or delivered

stopping rule, treatment plan (staggering administration ) 등 관해 fda guidance (Considerations for the Design of Early-Phase Clinical Trials of Cellular and Gene Therapy Products) 봐라!

Promoter

(P)1Relatively small size (1,179 bp), which is good

enhancer 와 promoter 와 intron 는 붙어다니는구나.

  • (CAG?)I: CMV early enhancer fused to modified chicken β-actin promoter
  • (CAG?)G: CMV early enhancer fused to modified chicken β-actin promoter
  • V: Human cytomegalovirus immediate early enhancer/promoter
  • K: phosphoglycerate kinase 1 promoter
  • C: Human ubiquitin C promoter
  • A: Human eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 α1 promoter

(EF1A short form): Human eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 α1 short form

Table 1

Comparison of Selected Ubiquitous and Cell-specific Promoters.

PromoterSpecificityRelative StrengthSize (bps)Reference(s)
CMVUbiquitous+++750–800Xu et al., 2001; Gray et al., 2011
CBA (including derivatives: CAG, CBh, etc.)Ubiquitous+++248–1,600Klein et al., 2002; Ohlfest et al., 2005; Gray et al., 2011
EF-1αUbiquitous++2,500Gill et al., 2001; Xu et al., 2001; Ikeda et al.,
UBCUbiquitous+403Gill et al., 2001; Qin et al., 2010
GUSB (hGBp)Ubiquitous+378Husain et al., 2009

Uncertain Spans

locationtranscriptionuncertainty
GT PK comparison header (NHP transduction note)(1 vg당 1 mRNA copy니 오시 않고 보통 수십개 나옴.The Korean note is partly wrapped onto a thin column; tokens 오시 않고 may be a transcription of 오지 않고 (“does not come”), but the visible glyphs remain as written.
GT PK Hunter,, TAK-073 row안 보네? (twice)The same text fills two adjacent merged columns; the source likely intends one statement spanning both columns rather than a duplicate, but the rendering here preserves both visible cells.
GT PK assay rowqPCR / RT-PCR / ELISA row alignmentThree sparse cells are spread across many narrow columns in the source; column-cell alignment beyond the visible labels is not fully reconstructed.
Promoter abbreviation list(CAG?)I and (CAG?)GTwo leftmost abbreviations are partly obscured by the Promoter heading and a leading paren glyph; both appear to point to CAG-style enhancer/promoter combinations but the exact key letter is not legible.